LRGC vs. EMOP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRGC (AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while EMOP is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRGC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.

Performance

LRGC vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a 7.44% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.

LRGC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.44%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMOP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 32.56%
• 6M: 34.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGC vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	7.44%	13.81%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	32.56%	16.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and EMOP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.69

LRGC vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGC	EMOP
Technology	34.0%	30.3%
Communication Services	13.2%	12.3%
Financial Services	12.9%	24.0%
Industrials	8.9%	8.1%
Healthcare	8.8%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	7.8%
Utilities	3.4%	2.8%
Energy	2.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	1.4%
Basic Materials	2.1%	7.0%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.3%

Return for Risk

LRGC vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC

LRGC Risk / Return Rank: 57
LRGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LRGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LRGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LRGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGC vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGC	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGC	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	2.93	-1.49

Drawdowns

LRGC vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and EMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGC	EMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.38%	-12.88%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.72%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-1.90%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRGC	EMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.88%	19.85%	-7.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	19.85%	-4.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.20%	19.85%	-4.65%

LRGC vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGC vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than EMOP's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.82%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%
LRGC AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF	0.54%	0.58%	0.46%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGC and EMOP in my portfolio?

LRGC and EMOP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRGC or EMOP?

On fees, LRGC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGC or EMOP?

LRGC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGC or EMOP?

EMOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.54% for LRGC.

What is the main difference between LRGC and EMOP?

LRGC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMOP is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LRGC and 0.70% for EMOP.