PortfoliosLab logo
LRGC vs. TCAF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LRGC and TCAF is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LRGC vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRGC:

0.55

TCAF:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

LRGC:

0.80

TCAF:

0.88

Omega Ratio

LRGC:

1.11

TCAF:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

LRGC:

0.47

TCAF:

0.59

Martin Ratio

LRGC:

1.69

TCAF:

2.34

Ulcer Index

LRGC:

5.40%

TCAF:

4.11%

Daily Std Dev

LRGC:

19.65%

TCAF:

18.13%

Max Drawdown

LRGC:

-19.38%

TCAF:

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

LRGC:

-5.19%

TCAF:

-3.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGC achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than TCAF's 0.63% return.


LRGC

YTD

-0.09%

1M

6.56%

6M

-3.05%

1Y

10.70%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TCAF

YTD

0.63%

1M

4.56%

6M

-2.05%

1Y

11.60%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LRGC vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRGC vs. TCAF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRGC is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRGC is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRGC is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRGC is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRGC is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRGC is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TCAF is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TCAF is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRGC vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LRGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the TCAF Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGC and TCAF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LRGC vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

LRGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than TCAF's 0.43% yield.


Drawdowns

LRGC vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGC drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than TCAF's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGC and TCAF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LRGC vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) at 4.47%. This indicates that LRGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...