PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIDV vs. UDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIDV vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIDV achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than UDIV's 13.99% return.


HIDV

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.64%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
10Y*

UDIV

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.61%
YTD
13.99%
6M
13.60%
1Y
31.69%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIDV vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
10.08%14.64%26.01%20.30%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
13.99%19.00%25.61%19.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HIDV and UDIV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.96

The correlation between HIDV and UDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIDV vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIDV vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HIDVUDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.77

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

16.60

-4.47

HIDV vs. UDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the UDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIDV and UDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HIDV vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIDV drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum UDIV drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIDV and UDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIDVUDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-35.21%

+16.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-8.44%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-19.19%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.56%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.05%

-4.63%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.91%

+0.31%

Volatility

HIDV vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) is 3.99%, while Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that HIDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIDVUDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.77%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

9.82%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

12.54%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.61%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

16.30%

-1.73%

HIDV vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIDV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIDV vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison

HIDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than UDIV's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.35%2.22%2.29%2.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.10%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, HIDV and UDIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UDIV has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to HIDV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIDV dropped -18.76% vs UDIV's -35.21%.

On 3-year performance, UDIV leads with 23.72% vs 21.10% for HIDV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 23.72% return vs 21.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.

HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.10% for UDIV.

HIDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while UDIV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HIDV and 0.06% for UDIV.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIDV and UDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer