XCHG vs. EYEG
XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and EYEG (AB Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCHG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while EYEG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EYEG.
Performance
XCHG vs. EYEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than EYEG's 0.01% return.
XCHG
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EYEG
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCHG vs. EYEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 5.48% | 0.30% |
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF | 0.01% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHG and EYEG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHG vs. EYEG — Risk / Return Rank
XCHG
EYEG
XCHG vs. EYEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHG | EYEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
XCHG vs. EYEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, which is greater than EYEG's maximum drawdown of -4.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and EYEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHG | EYEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -4.66% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -1.29% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -1.25% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility
XCHG vs. EYEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHG | EYEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 4.36% | +9.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 5.47% | +7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 5.47% | +7.97% |
XCHG vs. EYEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EYEG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHG vs. EYEG - Dividend Comparison
XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than EYEG's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF | 4.96% | 4.94% | 6.07% | 0.25% |
XCHG AB US Equity ETF | 0.22% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHG and EYEG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EYEG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EYEG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.
EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.22% for XCHG.
XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EYEG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.30% for EYEG.
Find the right allocation for XCHG and EYEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer