EYEG vs. BUFC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EYEG (AB Corporate Bond ETF) and BUFC (AB Conservative Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EYEG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while BUFC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EYEG returned 4.98% vs 8.44% for BUFC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EYEG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BUFC.

Performance

EYEG vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYEG achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than BUFC's 2.87% return.

EYEG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFC

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 2.86%
• 1Y: 8.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYEG vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF	0.47%	7.42%	3.17%	1.41%
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF	2.87%	5.50%	10.81%	0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EYEG and BUFC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.23

Return for Risk

EYEG vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYEG

EYEG Risk / Return Rank: 34
EYEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EYEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
EYEG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EYEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EYEG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BUFC

BUFC Risk / Return Rank: 58
BUFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BUFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BUFC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BUFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BUFC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYEG vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EYEG	BUFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.95	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.73	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.38	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	2.34	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	9.91	-4.85

EYEG vs. BUFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EYEG Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the BUFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EYEG and BUFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EYEG vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYEG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum BUFC drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYEG and BUFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EYEG	BUFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-8.29%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-3.62%	+0.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.19%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-0.75%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	0.85%	+0.14%

Volatility

EYEG vs. BUFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) is 1.13%, while AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that EYEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EYEG	BUFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	1.60%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.25%	3.53%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32%	4.35%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.45%	5.64%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.45%	5.64%	-0.19%

EYEG vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYEG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

EYEG vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison

EYEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while BUFC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF	4.93%	4.94%	6.07%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EYEG and BUFC in my portfolio?

EYEG and BUFC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EYEG or BUFC?

BUFC has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to EYEG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EYEG dropped -4.66% vs BUFC's -8.29%.

Which ETF is better, EYEG or BUFC?

On 1-year performance, BUFC leads with 8.44% vs 4.98% for EYEG. On fees, EYEG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EYEG has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EYEG or BUFC?

Over the 1-year period, BUFC has performed better with a 8.44% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EYEG or BUFC?

EYEG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EYEG or BUFC?

EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.00% for BUFC.

What is the main difference between EYEG and BUFC?

EYEG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BUFC is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EYEG and 0.69% for BUFC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.