XCCC vs. SCYB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - XCCC tracks the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index while SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XCCC returned 5.67% vs 6.99% for SCYB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCCC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

XCCC vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.55% return.

XCCC

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCCC vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	-0.05%	7.25%	13.01%	9.20%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	8.33%	8.15%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and SCYB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.81

The correlation between XCCC and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCCC vs. SCYB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCCC	SCYB
Communication Services	12.8%	8.9%
Energy	3.9%	5.8%
Industrials	3.7%	8.7%
Real Estate	3.7%	4.2%
Basic Materials	3.2%	3.5%
Healthcare	3.2%	5.8%
Technology	2.8%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	2.5%
Financial Services	0.7%	4.9%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

XCCC vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC

XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 27
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCCC	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.88	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.81	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.37	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	2.87	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	12.87	-9.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCCC vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCCC	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	1.88	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.68	-0.73

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCCC	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.99%	-4.92%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-2.44%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.33%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-0.52%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	0.54%	+0.99%

Volatility

XCCC vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.07%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCCC	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	1.07%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.02%	2.93%	+1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	3.76%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.82%	5.13%	+3.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.82%	5.13%	+3.69%

XCCC vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCCC vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than SCYB's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.94%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	10.05%	10.06%	10.68%	12.05%	7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCCC and SCYB in my portfolio?

XCCC and SCYB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCCC or SCYB?

XCCC has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

Which ETF is better, XCCC or SCYB?

On 1-year performance, SCYB leads with 6.99% vs 5.67% for XCCC. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCCC or SCYB?

Over the 1-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCCC or SCYB?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCCC or SCYB?

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 6.94% for SCYB.

What is the main difference between XCCC and SCYB?

XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.03% for SCYB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.