SCYB vs. FALN
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN).
SCYB and FALN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCYB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2023. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. Both SCYB and FALN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCYB vs. FALN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCYB vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | -0.47% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | -1.06% | 8.92% | 7.68% | 7.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than FALN's -1.06% return.
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FALN
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.67%
- 1Y
- 6.34%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCYB vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SCYB vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank
SCYB
FALN
SCYB vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCYB | FALN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 1.31 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.15 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 4.96 | +3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCYB | FALN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.72 | +0.90 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCYB and FALN is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCYB vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison
SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, more than FALN's 6.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 7.01% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.51% | 6.31% | 6.24% | 5.37% | 5.08% | 3.40% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.98% | 3.55% |
Drawdowns
SCYB vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum FALN drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and FALN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCYB | FALN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -29.22% | +24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.22% | -5.57% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -2.83% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -3.37% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 1.29% | -0.49% |
Volatility
SCYB vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 2.25%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCYB | FALN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.77% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 3.53% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 6.90% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 7.28% | -2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 9.01% | -3.81% |