XCCC vs. IOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCCC is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCCC returned 10.79%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for IOO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

XCCC vs. IOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 12.26% return.

XCCC

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IOO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 6M: 12.43%
• 1Y: 38.24%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 16.68%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCCC vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	-0.05%	7.25%	13.01%	20.57%	-5.33%
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	12.26%	27.02%	26.54%	27.71%	-5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and IOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022	0.62

The correlation between XCCC and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCCC vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCCC	IOO
Communication Services	12.8%	11.0%
Energy	3.9%	3.6%
Industrials	3.7%	4.8%
Real Estate	3.7%	0.2%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.7%
Healthcare	3.2%	8.4%
Technology	2.8%	46.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	5.6%
Financial Services	0.7%	9.1%
Utilities	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

XCCC vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC

XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 27
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 28
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

IOO

IOO Risk / Return Rank: 82
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCCC	IOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.84	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	3.85	-2.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.50	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	3.87	-2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	17.94	-14.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCCC vs. IOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the IOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and IOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCCC	IOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	2.84	-1.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.39	+0.57

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum IOO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and IOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCCC	IOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.99%	-55.85%	+44.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-9.94%	+4.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.99%	-19.19%	+8.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-1.33%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-11.27%	+9.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	2.14%	-0.61%

Volatility

XCCC vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) is 1.51%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that XCCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCCC	IOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	3.81%	-2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.02%	10.59%	-6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.25%	13.54%	-8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.82%	17.04%	-8.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.82%	17.78%	-8.96%

XCCC vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XCCC and IOO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

XCCC vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than IOO's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF	0.82%	0.92%	1.08%	1.49%	2.00%	1.53%	1.49%	2.02%	2.54%	2.23%	2.75%	2.89%
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	10.05%	10.06%	10.68%	12.05%	7.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCCC and IOO in my portfolio?

XCCC and IOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCCC or IOO?

IOO has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to XCCC (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs IOO's -55.85%.

Which ETF is better, XCCC or IOO?

On 3-year performance, IOO leads with 25.48% vs 10.79% for XCCC. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, XCCC has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCCC or IOO?

Over the 3-year period, IOO has performed better with a 25.48% return vs 10.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCCC or IOO?

XCCC and IOO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCCC or IOO?

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.05%, compared with 0.82% for IOO.

What is the main difference between XCCC and IOO?

XCCC is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IOO is Global Equities. XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.