PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IOO vs. NDQ.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IOO vs. NDQ.AX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX).

IOO and NDQ.AX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000. NDQ.AX is a passively managed fund by BetaShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jul 20, 2020. Both IOO and NDQ.AX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF		-4.50%27.02%26.54%27.71%-16.34%26.03%18.61%30.01%-6.22%23.56%
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		-7.78%20.96%25.69%53.31%-32.91%27.91%47.61%39.15%-1.47%32.08%
Different Trading Currencies

IOO is traded in USD, while NDQ.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the NDQ.AX values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IOO achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly higher than NDQ.AX's -7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IOO has underperformed NDQ.AX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while NDQ.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.36% annualized return.

IOO

1D
3.46%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
1.16%
1Y
26.95%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
15.03%

NDQ.AX

1D
1.07%
1M
-6.37%
YTD
-7.78%
6M
-4.56%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
22.23%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
18.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global 100 ETF

BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF

Often compared with IOO:
IOO vs. IVVIOO vs. SPYIOO vs. OEFIOO vs. NDAQIOO vs. VGTIOO vs. MOATIOO vs. AIA
Often compared with NDQ.AX:
NDQ.AX vs. QQQNDQ.AX vs. IVVNDQ.AX vs. BTC-USDNDQ.AX vs. TQQQNDQ.AX vs. SCHGNDQ.AX vs. JPMNDQ.AX vs. IYW

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IOO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NDQ.AX's 0.48% expense ratio.

NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF

Return for Risk

IOO vs. NDQ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IOO
IOO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX
NDQ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDQ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IOONDQ.AXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.03

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

1.56

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.49

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.38

6.41

+3.97

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the NDQ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IOO and NDQ.AX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IOONDQ.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.03

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.56

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.85

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.78

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between IOO and NDQ.AX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Dividend Comparison

IOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than NDQ.AX's 1.82% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF		0.96%0.92%1.08%1.49%2.00%1.53%1.49%2.02%2.54%2.23%2.75%2.89%
NDQ.AX
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF		1.82%1.67%1.86%2.17%3.36%3.33%2.47%2.22%0.52%0.45%0.43%0.00%

Drawdowns

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IOO drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than NDQ.AX's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IOO and NDQ.AX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IOONDQ.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.85%

-30.79%

-25.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-15.17%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-30.79%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.43%

-30.79%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.82%

-15.15%

+8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-5.90%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

5.53%

-2.92%

Volatility

IOO vs. NDQ.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) and BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ.AX) have volatilities of 6.26% and 6.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IOONDQ.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

6.48%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

12.49%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.22%

23.81%

-4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

22.03%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

21.61%

-3.87%