XBOX vs. FLTR
XBOX (Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF) and FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBOX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. XBOX is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.
Performance
XBOX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBOX
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
XBOX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBOX Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF | 1.27% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBOX and FLTR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBOX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
XBOX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLTR
XBOX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF (XBOX) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBOX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 16.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 94.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBOX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBOX drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBOX and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBOX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -17.84% | +17.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.67% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility
XBOX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBOX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 0.80% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 2.13% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 5.00% | -2.93% |
XBOX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XBOX and FLTR have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XBOX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
XBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.64% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
XBOX Roundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBOX and FLTR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBOX and FLTR have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.00% for XBOX.
XBOX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for XBOX and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer