XBNB vs. TAGS
XBNB (Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XBNB is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Binance Coin (BNB), while TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBNB charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
XBNB vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBNB
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -15.49%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- -6.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- -1.05%
XBNB vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF | -21.36% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBNB and TAGS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBNB vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
XBNB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TAGS
XBNB vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBNB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBNB vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBNB drawdown since its inception was -40.97%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBNB and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBNB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.97% | -76.40% | +35.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.67% | -62.19% | +27.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.62% | -57.26% | +37.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.73% | — |
Volatility
XBNB vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBNB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.63% | 12.81% | +73.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.63% | 16.10% | +70.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.63% | 18.00% | +68.63% |
XBNB vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBNB has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBNB vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
XBNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% |
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBNB and TAGS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XBNB.
XBNB has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
XBNB is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. XBNB tracks Binance Coin (BNB), while TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XBNB and 0.21% for TAGS.
Find the right allocation for XBNB and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer