XBNB vs. BEGS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

XBNB (Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF) and BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) are both Leveraged Cryptocurrency funds. XBNB is passively managed, while BEGS is actively managed. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XBNB charges 1.89%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEGS.

Performance

XBNB vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBNB

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 10.37%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BEGS

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 3.77%
• 6M: -38.31%
• YTD: -39.57%
• 1Y: -37.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -14.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	$24.77K	$66.98K	$58.87K
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	$4.00K	$3.54K	$6.15K

XBNB vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	-18.70%
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-31.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XBNB and BEGS is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

XBNB vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBNB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 4
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBNB vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF (XBNB) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBNB	BEGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.94	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.15	—

Drawdowns

XBNB vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBNB drawdown since its inception was -40.97%, smaller than the maximum BEGS drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBNB and BEGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBNB	BEGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.97%	-60.23%	+19.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-60.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.46%	-55.22%	+22.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.96%	-20.94%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	32.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBNB	BEGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	52.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.05%	67.71%	+12.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.05%	63.09%	+16.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.05%	63.09%	+16.96%

XBNB vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBNB has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBNB vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison

XBNB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BEGS's 79.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	79.80%	48.23%
XBNB Teucrium xETFs 2x Long Daily BNB ETF	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBNB and BEGS in my portfolio?

XBNB and BEGS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBNB or BEGS?

On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBNB or BEGS?

BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XBNB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBNB or BEGS?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 79.80%, compared with 0.01% for XBNB.

What is the main difference between XBNB and BEGS?

They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Rareview. Their fees differ too: 1.89% for XBNB and 0.99% for BEGS.