PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.50%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.91%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and QQQI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBCI

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBCI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCIQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

1.34

-1.96

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-20.00%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.99%

-0.17%

-25.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-2.20%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

XBCI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.08%

12.98%

+54.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.08%

17.07%

+50.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.08%

17.07%

+50.01%

XBCI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBCI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than QQQI's 13.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.19%13.82%12.85%
XBCI
NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF
20.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBCI and QQQI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 13.19% for QQQI.

XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.68% for QQQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCI and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer