PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. NIHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XBCI vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XBCI vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NIHI

1D
1.58%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
0.34%
6M
4.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XBCI vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. NIHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCINIHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.64

0.70

-1.35

Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and NIHI is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XBCI vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than NIHI's 6.40% yield.


Drawdowns

XBCI vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, which is greater than NIHI's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and NIHI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCINIHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-10.88%

-8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.88%

-6.28%

-5.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-2.24%

-8.89%

Volatility

XBCI vs. NIHI - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XBCINIHIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.31%

15.52%

+70.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.31%

15.52%

+70.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.31%

15.52%

+70.79%