XBCI vs. IAUI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.

Performance

XBCI vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XBCI

• 1D: -3.45%
• 1M: -4.99%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAUI

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: -4.57%
• 6M: -12.10%
• YTD: -7.82%
• 1Y: 10.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCI vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-24.98%
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	-11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and IAUI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

XBCI vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IAUI

IAUI Risk / Return Rank: 17
IAUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
IAUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
IAUI Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IAUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
IAUI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBCI vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBCI	IAUI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.47	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.26	—

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and IAUI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBCI	IAUI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.31%	-22.50%	-14.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.79%	-21.82%	-10.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.10%	-4.92%	-9.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XBCI	IAUI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.47%	21.83%	+43.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.47%	21.10%	+44.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.47%	21.10%	+44.37%

XBCI vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBCI vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.75%, more than IAUI's 14.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF	14.07%	6.88%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	26.75%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBCI and IAUI in my portfolio?

XBCI and IAUI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XBCI or IAUI?

On fees, IAUI is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBCI or IAUI?

IAUI is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBCI or IAUI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 26.75%, compared with 14.07% for IAUI.

What is the main difference between XBCI and IAUI?

XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IAUI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.78% for IAUI.