XBCI vs. CSHI
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the NONE. XBCI is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.
Performance
XBCI vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- -23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -16.32% |
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and CSHI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
CSHI
XBCI vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 4.18 | -4.81 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and CSHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -1.69% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | 0.00% | -25.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -0.03% | -8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 0.86% | +66.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 1.32% | +65.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 1.32% | +65.76% |
XBCI vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, more than CSHI's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.90% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 20.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCI and CSHI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 4.90% for CSHI.
XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.38% for CSHI.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and CSHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer