PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. KULR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.


XAR

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.15%
YTD
12.43%
6M
16.39%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
32.47%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
17.82%

KULR

1D
-2.10%
1M
29.07%
YTD
26.01%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
-60.49%
3Y*
-11.82%
5Y*
-29.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
12.43%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-13.55%
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
26.01%-89.58%1,818.92%-84.58%-56.52%87.76%-2.00%-42.31%73.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and KULR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.22

Over the past year, XAR and KULR have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

KULR
KULR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XARKULRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.94

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

-0.76

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

-0.99

+7.13

XAR vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and KULR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XARKULRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

-0.57

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

-0.23

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

-0.11

+0.95

Drawdowns

XAR vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and KULR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARKULRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-97.23%

+50.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-79.80%

+62.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-94.74%

+75.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-96.86%

+64.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-90.29%

+82.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-66.23%

+59.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

60.84%

-54.75%

Volatility

XAR vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 9.09%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARKULRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

47.09%

-38.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

76.46%

-53.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.05%

106.05%

-79.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

126.05%

-102.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

126.51%

-101.86%

Dividends

XAR vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.32%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and KULR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to XAR (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs KULR's -97.23%.

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and KULR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer