XAR vs. KULR
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XAR returned 15.97%/yr vs -29.09%/yr for KULR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XAR vs. KULR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.
XAR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 17.82%
KULR
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 29.07%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -60.49%
- 3Y*
- -11.82%
- 5Y*
- -29.09%
- 10Y*
- —
XAR vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 12.43% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -13.55% |
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 26.01% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | 73.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and KULR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.22 |
Over the past year, XAR and KULR have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
KULR
XAR vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XAR | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.94 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | -0.76 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | -0.99 | +7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XAR | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | -0.57 | +1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | -0.23 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | -0.11 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
XAR vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and KULR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -97.23% | +50.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -79.80% | +62.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -94.74% | +75.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -96.86% | +64.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -90.29% | +82.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -66.23% | +59.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 60.84% | -54.75% |
Volatility
XAR vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) is 9.09%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that XAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | KULR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 47.09% | -38.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.58% | 76.46% | -53.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.05% | 106.05% | -79.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 126.05% | -102.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 126.51% | -101.86% |
Dividends
XAR vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and KULR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to XAR (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs KULR's -97.23%.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and KULR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer