AFOS vs. DUKQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) and DUKQ (Ocean Park Domestic ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, AFOS returned 69.34% vs 20.58% for DUKQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFOS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for DUKQ.

Performance

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFOS achieves a 29.03% return, which is significantly higher than DUKQ's 12.47% return.

AFOS

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -0.04%
• 6M: 20.26%
• YTD: 29.03%
• 1Y: 69.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DUKQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 9.49%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 1Y: 20.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	29.03%	37.10%
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	12.47%	10.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AFOS and DUKQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.82

The correlation between AFOS and DUKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AFOS vs. DUKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFOS

AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 95
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

DUKQ

DUKQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
DUKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
DUKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DUKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
DUKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
DUKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) and Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFOS	DUKQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	1.56	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	2.18	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.28	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.05	2.63	+3.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.43	10.69	+15.74

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFOS Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the DUKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFOS and DUKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFOS drawdown since its inception was -11.52%, smaller than the maximum DUKQ drawdown of -18.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFOS and DUKQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFOS	DUKQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.52%	-18.44%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.52%	-7.84%	-3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-1.55%	-4.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-3.77%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.63%	1.93%	+0.70%

Volatility

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Volatility Comparison

ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Ocean Park Domestic ETF (DUKQ) at 4.73%. This indicates that AFOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFOS	DUKQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.09%	4.73%	+4.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.44%	10.49%	+7.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.13%	13.31%	+8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.75%	14.94%	+6.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.75%	14.94%	+6.81%

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFOS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKQ's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFOS vs. DUKQ - Dividend Comparison

AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than DUKQ's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%
DUKQ Ocean Park Domestic ETF	0.32%	0.68%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFOS and DUKQ in my portfolio?

AFOS and DUKQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFOS or DUKQ?

AFOS has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to DUKQ (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFOS dropped -11.52% vs DUKQ's -18.44%.

Which ETF is better, AFOS or DUKQ?

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 69.34% vs 20.58% for DUKQ. On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DUKQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFOS or DUKQ?

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 69.34% return vs 20.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFOS or DUKQ?

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for DUKQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFOS or DUKQ?

DUKQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.

What is the main difference between AFOS and DUKQ?

They also come from different issuers: ARS Investment Partners and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AFOS and 0.98% for DUKQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.