WWR vs. UAMY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WWR (Westwater Resources, Inc.) and UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 5 years, WWR returned -34.02%/yr vs 57.05%/yr for UAMY. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WWR vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWR achieves a -27.33% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 82.47% return.

WWR

• 1D: -5.02%
• 1M: -16.26%
• YTD: -27.33%
• 6M: -38.85%
• 1Y: 16.40%
• 3Y*: -14.44%
• 5Y*: -34.02%
• 10Y*: —

UAMY

• 1D: -10.11%
• 1M: -22.04%
• YTD: 82.47%
• 6M: 72.18%
• 1Y: 244.36%
• 3Y*: 203.89%
• 5Y*: 57.05%
• 10Y*: 45.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWR vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WWR Westwater Resources, Inc.	-27.33%	5.87%	25.40%	-28.49%	-63.26%	-56.39%	133.65%	-69.86%	-86.92%	-18.94%
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	82.47%	183.62%	610.84%	-48.86%	-2.19%	-4.64%	35.58%	-33.62%	81.25%	-11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WWR and UAMY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017	0.20

Over the past year, WWR and UAMY have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap WWR : $66.80M UAMY : $1.30B
EPS WWR : -$0.30 UAMY : -$0.13
PB Ratio WWR : 0.37 UAMY : 9.83
Total Revenue (TTM) WWR : $0.00 UAMY : $39.04M
Gross Profit (TTM) WWR : -$603.00K UAMY : $4.34M
EBITDA (TTM) WWR : -$17.25M UAMY : -$15.23M

Return for Risk

WWR vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWR

WWR Risk / Return Rank: 49
WWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
WWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
WWR Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
WWR Martin Ratio Rank: 44

UAMY

UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 82
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 79
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWR vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WWR	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	1.86	-1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	2.68	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.30	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	3.31	-3.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	5.78	-5.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WWR vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWR and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WWR	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	1.86	-1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.41	0.61	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	0.07	-0.48

Drawdowns

WWR vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWR drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWR and UAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WWR	UAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.48%	-96.44%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.34%	-74.30%	-10.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.34%	-74.30%	-10.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.42%	-80.46%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.30%	-47.57%	-51.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-91.22%	-66.43%	-24.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.09%	42.51%	+17.58%

Volatility

WWR vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) is 13.96%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 32.49%. This indicates that WWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WWR	UAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.96%	32.49%	-18.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.16%	92.81%	-37.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.67%	132.11%	-17.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.66%	94.88%	-12.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	104.21%	101.04%	+3.17%

Dividends

WWR vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither WWR nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WWR and UAMY in my portfolio?

WWR and UAMY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WWR or UAMY?

UAMY has higher volatility (32.49%) compared to WWR (13.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWR dropped -99.48% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.