PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWR vs. AMG.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV (AMG.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WWR is traded in USD, while AMG.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMG.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWR achieves a -27.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMG.AS's 39.40% return.


WWR

1D
-5.02%
1M
-16.26%
YTD
-27.33%
6M
-38.85%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
-14.44%
5Y*
-34.02%
10Y*

AMG.AS

1D
-3.69%
1M
12.55%
YTD
39.40%
6M
49.90%
1Y
121.27%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
-27.33%5.87%25.40%-28.49%-63.26%-56.39%133.65%-69.86%-86.92%-18.94%
AMG.AS
AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV
39.40%136.15%-41.60%-30.11%17.11%8.11%24.66%-22.37%-35.43%44.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WWR and AMG.AS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017

0.14

The correlation between WWR and AMG.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWR vs. AMG.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWR
WWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

AMG.AS
AMG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AMG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AMG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV (AMG.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWRAMG.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

4.69

-4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

10.30

-10.03

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the AMG.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWR and AMG.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWRAMG.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.40

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.14

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.03

-0.44

Drawdowns

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWR drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum AMG.AS drawdown of -95.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWR and AMG.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWRAMG.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.48%

-95.33%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.34%

-25.41%

-58.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.34%

-74.84%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.42%

-74.84%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.30%

-44.96%

-54.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.22%

-72.72%

-18.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.09%

11.64%

+48.45%

Volatility

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) is 13.96%, while AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV (AMG.AS) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that WWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMG.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWRAMG.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.96%

16.57%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.16%

39.29%

+15.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.67%

49.72%

+64.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.66%

48.09%

+34.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.21%

47.01%

+57.20%

Dividends

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Dividend Comparison

WWR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMG.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMG.AS
AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV
1.00%1.41%2.88%3.51%1.74%0.71%1.23%2.29%1.21%0.67%1.62%1.11%
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WWR vs. AMG.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westwater Resources, Inc. and AMG Advanced Metallurgical Group NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. WWR values in USD, AMG.AS values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


WWR and AMG.AS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWR and AMG.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer