PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWR vs. UUUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WWR vs. UUUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWR achieves a -27.33% return, which is significantly lower than UUUU's 23.80% return.


WWR

1D
-5.02%
1M
-16.26%
YTD
-27.33%
6M
-38.85%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
-14.44%
5Y*
-34.02%
10Y*

UUUU

1D
-7.88%
1M
-16.74%
YTD
23.80%
6M
19.21%
1Y
222.58%
3Y*
41.23%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWR vs. UUUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
-27.33%5.87%25.40%-28.49%-63.26%-56.39%133.65%-69.86%-86.92%-18.94%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
23.80%183.43%-28.65%15.78%-18.61%79.11%123.04%-32.98%59.22%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WWR and UUUU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017

0.29

The correlation between WWR and UUUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

WWR:

-$0.30

UUUU:

-$0.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

WWR:

$0.00

UUUU:

$84.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WWR:

-$603.00K

UUUU:

$31.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

WWR:

-$17.25M

UUUU:

-$78.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWR vs. UUUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWR
WWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

UUUU
UUUU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UUUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUUU Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UUUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUUU Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWR vs. UUUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWRUUUUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

2.38

-2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

2.76

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

4.37

-4.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.27

8.83

-8.56

WWR vs. UUUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the UUUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWR and UUUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWRUUUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.38

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.28

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

-0.13

-0.27

Drawdowns

WWR vs. UUUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWR drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, roughly equal to the maximum UUUU drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWR and UUUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWRUUUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.48%

-99.64%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.34%

-51.28%

-33.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.34%

-61.52%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.42%

-68.70%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.30%

-92.34%

-6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.22%

-92.65%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.09%

25.33%

+34.76%

Volatility

WWR vs. UUUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) is 13.96%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) has a volatility of 25.45%. This indicates that WWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UUUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWRUUUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.96%

25.45%

-11.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.16%

65.27%

-10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.67%

95.07%

+19.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.66%

73.00%

+9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.21%

72.53%

+31.68%

Dividends

WWR vs. UUUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WWR nor UUUU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WWR vs. UUUU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westwater Resources, Inc. and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M202220232024202520260
35.84M
(WWR) Total Revenue
(UUUU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WWR and UUUU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UUUU has higher volatility (25.45%) compared to WWR (13.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWR dropped -99.48% vs UUUU's -99.64%.

UUUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWR and UUUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer