PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWR vs. NDA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and Aurubis AG (NDA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WWR is traded in USD, while NDA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NDA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWR achieves a -27.33% return, which is significantly lower than NDA.DE's 76.09% return.


WWR

1D
-5.02%
1M
-16.26%
YTD
-27.33%
6M
-38.85%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
-14.44%
5Y*
-34.02%
10Y*

NDA.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
21.42%
YTD
76.09%
6M
85.61%
1Y
182.12%
3Y*
47.79%
5Y*
23.53%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
-27.33%5.87%25.40%-28.49%-63.26%-56.39%133.65%-69.86%-86.92%-18.94%
NDA.DE
Aurubis AG
76.09%86.16%-0.34%2.20%-16.80%32.03%31.31%28.04%-45.75%7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between WWR and NDA.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017

0.13

The correlation between WWR and NDA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWR vs. NDA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWR
WWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NDA.DE
NDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) and Aurubis AG (NDA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWRNDA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

4.83

-4.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

5.13

-3.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.65

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

10.09

-9.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.27

32.24

-31.96

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the NDA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWR and NDA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWRNDA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

4.83

-4.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.58

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.35

-0.75

Drawdowns

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWR drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, which is greater than NDA.DE's maximum drawdown of -63.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWR and NDA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWRNDA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.48%

-63.65%

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.34%

-17.94%

-66.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.34%

-32.80%

-51.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.42%

-60.20%

-32.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.30%

0.00%

-99.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.22%

-23.15%

-68.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.09%

5.62%

+54.47%

Volatility

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) has a higher volatility of 13.96% compared to Aurubis AG (NDA.DE) at 13.22%. This indicates that WWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWRNDA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.96%

13.22%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.16%

29.03%

+26.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.67%

37.48%

+77.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.66%

39.81%

+42.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

104.21%

36.55%

+67.66%

Dividends

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Dividend Comparison

WWR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NDA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NDA.DE
Aurubis AG
0.73%1.21%1.83%2.42%2.10%2.76%1.96%2.83%3.35%1.61%2.46%2.13%
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WWR vs. NDA.DE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Westwater Resources, Inc. and Aurubis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. WWR values in USD, NDA.DE values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


WWR and NDA.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWR and NDA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer