PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WWJD vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WWJD vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.


WWJD

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.28%
YTD
7.15%
6M
9.72%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WWJD vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
7.15%29.28%1.05%16.42%-14.60%16.60%12.91%11.34%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between WWJD and VEA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.94

The correlation between WWJD and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

WWJD vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WWJD
VEA

Industrials

20.1%
19.2%

Financial Services

18.1%
23.3%

Basic Materials

13.8%
7.5%

Utilities

10.2%
3.3%

Energy

7.6%
5.4%

Technology

7.2%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.5%

Healthcare

5.6%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.6%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.4%

Industrials

WWJD
20.1%
VEA
19.2%

Financial Services

WWJD
18.1%
VEA
23.3%

Basic Materials

WWJD
13.8%
VEA
7.5%

Utilities

WWJD
10.2%
VEA
3.3%

Energy

WWJD
7.6%
VEA
5.4%

Technology

WWJD
7.2%
VEA
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WWJD
6.9%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

WWJD
5.6%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

WWJD
5.4%
VEA
5.6%

Real Estate

WWJD
3.1%
VEA
2.7%

Communication Services

WWJD
2.0%
VEA
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WWJD vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WWJD
WWJD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
WWJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWJD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
WWJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWJD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WWJD vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WWJDVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.81

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

10.94

-3.92

WWJD vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WWJD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WWJD and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WWJDVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.09

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.58

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.25

+0.32

Drawdowns

WWJD vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WWJDVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-60.68%

+24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-11.63%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.97%

-13.45%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-29.71%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.90%

-2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-13.29%

+6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.98%

-0.21%

Volatility

WWJD vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) is 4.73%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that WWJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WWJDVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

5.66%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

13.32%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

15.66%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.55%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

17.36%

+2.72%

WWJD vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

WWJD has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

WWJD vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
WWJD
Inspire International ESG ETF
2.21%2.58%2.99%2.56%2.09%15.22%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WWJD and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to WWJD (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWJD dropped -35.76% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.60% vs 6.59% for WWJD. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, WWJD has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WWJD.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.21% for WWJD.

WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for WWJD and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WWJD and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer