WWJD vs. VEA
WWJD (Inspire International ESG ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - WWJD tracks the Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WWJD returned 6.59%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WWJD charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
WWJD vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WWJD achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.
WWJD
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
WWJD vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 7.15% | 29.28% | 1.05% | 16.42% | -14.60% | 16.60% | 12.91% | 11.34% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between WWJD and VEA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between WWJD and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
WWJD vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WWJD
VEA
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Industrials
WWJD
VEA
Financial Services
WWJD
VEA
Basic Materials
WWJD
VEA
Utilities
WWJD
VEA
Energy
WWJD
VEA
Technology
WWJD
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
WWJD
VEA
Healthcare
WWJD
VEA
Consumer Defensive
WWJD
VEA
Real Estate
WWJD
VEA
Communication Services
WWJD
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WWJD vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
WWJD
VEA
WWJD vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WWJD | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.81 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 10.94 | -3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WWJD | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.09 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.25 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
WWJD vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WWJD drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WWJD and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WWJD | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -60.68% | +24.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -11.63% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.97% | -13.45% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -29.71% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.90% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -13.29% | +6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.98% | -0.21% |
Volatility
WWJD vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire International ESG ETF (WWJD) is 4.73%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that WWJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WWJD | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 5.66% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 13.32% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 15.66% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 16.55% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 17.36% | +2.72% |
WWJD vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
WWJD has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
WWJD vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
WWJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
WWJD Inspire International ESG ETF | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 2.09% | 15.22% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WWJD and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to WWJD (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WWJD dropped -35.76% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.60% vs 6.59% for WWJD. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, WWJD has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.60% return vs 6.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for WWJD.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.21% for WWJD.
WWJD tracks Inspire Global Hope Ex-US Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for WWJD and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WWJD and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer