WUGI vs. QQH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WUGI (Esoterica NextG Economy ETF) and QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WUGI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Esoterica, while QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index. WUGI is actively managed, while QQH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WUGI returned 16.13%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for QQH. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WUGI charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for QQH.

Performance

WUGI vs. QQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WUGI achieves a 23.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQH's 8.65% return.

WUGI

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 23.35%
• 6M: 25.24%
• 1Y: 38.78%
• 3Y*: 33.73%
• 5Y*: 16.13%
• 10Y*: —

QQH

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 8.65%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 30.75%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 13.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WUGI vs. QQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WUGI Esoterica NextG Economy ETF	23.35%	22.66%	47.14%	61.30%	-49.55%	25.18%	97.36%
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	8.65%	15.66%	33.64%	48.05%	-39.60%	37.52%	62.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WUGI and QQH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2020	0.84

The correlation between WUGI and QQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

WUGI vs. QQH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WUGI	QQH
Technology	70.5%	56.6%
Communication Services	12.1%	14.9%
Industrials	9.3%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	13.6%
Financial Services	1.8%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.2%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	6.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.0%
Basic Materials	0.0%	1.0%
Energy	0.0%	0.5%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

WUGI vs. QQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WUGI

WUGI Risk / Return Rank: 49
WUGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
WUGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
WUGI Omega Ratio Rank: 49
WUGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
WUGI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QQH

QQH Risk / Return Rank: 42
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WUGI vs. QQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) and HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WUGI	QQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.39	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.84	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.24	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	1.91	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.02	5.10	+1.91

WUGI vs. QQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WUGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the QQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WUGI and QQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WUGI vs. QQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WUGI drawdown since its inception was -56.41%, which is greater than QQH's maximum drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WUGI and QQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WUGI	QQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.41%	-41.87%	-14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.99%	-16.18%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.49%	-24.84%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.41%	-41.87%	-14.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-5.87%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.61%	-12.90%	-3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.54%	6.04%	-0.50%

Volatility

WUGI vs. QQH - Volatility Comparison

Esoterica NextG Economy ETF (WUGI) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) at 9.85%. This indicates that WUGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WUGI	QQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.03%	9.85%	+3.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.14%	16.84%	+5.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.36%	22.17%	+3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.07%	21.81%	+9.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.09%	24.89%	+6.20%

WUGI vs. QQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WUGI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QQH's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

WUGI vs. QQH - Dividend Comparison

WUGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.51%, more than QQH's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%
WUGI Esoterica NextG Economy ETF	18.51%	22.83%	4.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WUGI and QQH in my portfolio?

WUGI and QQH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WUGI or QQH?

WUGI has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to QQH (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WUGI dropped -56.41% vs QQH's -41.87%.

Which ETF is better, WUGI or QQH?

On 5-year performance, WUGI leads with 16.13% vs 13.32% for QQH. On fees, WUGI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QQH has been the lower-risk option at 9.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WUGI or QQH?

Over the 5-year period, WUGI has performed better with a 16.13% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WUGI or QQH?

WUGI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WUGI or QQH?

WUGI has the higher dividend yield at 18.51%, compared with 0.19% for QQH.

What is the main difference between WUGI and QQH?

WUGI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQH is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Esoterica and Howard Capital Management. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WUGI and 1.14% for QQH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WUGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.