PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTS vs. GFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

WTS vs. GFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WTS vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
5.34%36.85%-1.62%43.57%-24.08%60.63%23.14%56.20%-14.13%17.84%
GFF
Griffon Corporation
-1.06%4.42%17.97%83.96%36.91%41.60%1.83%97.74%-44.92%-21.43%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WTS:

$9.70B

GFF:

$3.33B

EPS

WTS:

$10.18

GFF:

$0.97

PE Ratio

WTS:

28.51

GFF:

75.25

PEG Ratio

WTS:

1.33

GFF:

0.98

PS Ratio

WTS:

3.98

GFF:

1.32

PB Ratio

WTS:

4.78

GFF:

30.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

WTS:

$2.44B

GFF:

$2.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WTS:

$1.21B

GFF:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

WTS:

$509.60M

GFF:

$261.84M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than GFF's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, WTS has underperformed GFF with an annualized return of 19.14%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively higher 20.49% annualized return.


WTS

1D
2.29%
1M
-11.70%
YTD
5.34%
6M
4.30%
1Y
43.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
20.13%
10Y*
19.14%

GFF

1D
3.05%
1M
-14.73%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-4.03%
1Y
2.72%
3Y*
35.72%
5Y*
26.00%
10Y*
20.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTS vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTS
WTS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
WTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
WTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GFF
GFF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTS vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTSGFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

0.07

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

0.37

+2.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.05

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.15

+2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.00

0.42

+9.58

WTS vs. GFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the GFF Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTS and GFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTSGFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

0.07

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.64

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.46

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.04

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between WTS and GFF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WTS vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison

WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than GFF's 1.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.72%0.72%0.81%0.66%0.79%0.52%0.76%0.90%1.27%0.99%1.09%1.33%
GFF
Griffon Corporation
1.10%1.03%0.88%4.10%6.62%1.16%1.50%1.44%12.27%1.23%0.80%0.96%

Drawdowns

WTS vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and GFF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WTSGFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-96.84%

+33.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-27.85%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.08%

-39.02%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-61.32%

+17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.51%

-23.17%

+9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-55.65%

+39.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

10.08%

-5.74%

Volatility

WTS vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 6.31%, while Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WTSGFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

10.59%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.50%

22.42%

-4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.08%

36.76%

-8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.83%

40.82%

-12.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.19%

45.08%

-16.89%

Financials

WTS vs. GFF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
625.10M
649.09M
(WTS) Total Revenue
(GFF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WTS vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Griffon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
49.5%
41.1%
Portfolio components
WTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 309.20M and revenue of 625.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

GFF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 266.77M and revenue of 649.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

WTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 113.70M and revenue of 625.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

GFF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 113.36M and revenue of 649.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

WTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 83.70M and revenue of 625.10M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

GFF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 64.39M and revenue of 649.09M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.