PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTKWY vs. ^NYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WTKWY vs. ^NYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wolters Kluwer NV (WTKWY) and NYSE Composite (^NYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTKWY achieves a -30.59% return, which is significantly lower than ^NYA's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, WTKWY has underperformed ^NYA with an annualized return of 7.44%, while ^NYA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.27% annualized return.


WTKWY

1D
-1.64%
1M
-0.57%
6M
-30.30%
YTD
-30.59%
1Y
-55.43%
3Y*
-16.31%
5Y*
-6.40%
10Y*
7.44%

^NYA

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.06%
6M
5.26%
YTD
8.37%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTKWY vs. ^NYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTKWY
Wolters Kluwer NV
-30.59%-36.20%17.53%36.95%-9.84%43.14%17.24%25.81%14.47%48.79%
^NYA
NYSE Composite
8.37%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between WTKWY and ^NYA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between WTKWY and ^NYA has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTKWY vs. ^NYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTKWY
WTKWY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
WTKWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTKWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTKWY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WTKWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTKWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTKWY vs. ^NYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wolters Kluwer NV (WTKWY) and NYSE Composite (^NYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTKWY^NYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.25

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

1.93

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

7.14

-8.49

WTKWY vs. ^NYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTKWY Sharpe Ratio is -1.53, which is lower than the ^NYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTKWY and ^NYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTKWY vs. ^NYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTKWY drawdown since its inception was -65.12%, which is greater than ^NYA's maximum drawdown of -59.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTKWY and ^NYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTKWY^NYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.12%

-59.01%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.98%

-8.26%

-51.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.12%

-15.21%

-49.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.12%

-22.37%

-42.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.12%

-38.11%

-27.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.38%

-0.95%

-60.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-9.84%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.18%

2.23%

+38.95%

Volatility

WTKWY vs. ^NYA - Volatility Comparison

Wolters Kluwer NV (WTKWY) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to NYSE Composite (^NYA) at 2.32%. This indicates that WTKWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTKWY^NYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

2.32%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.71%

8.75%

+20.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.24%

11.24%

+25.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.18%

14.85%

+11.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

16.81%

+6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTKWY and ^NYA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTKWY has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to ^NYA (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTKWY dropped -65.12% vs ^NYA's -59.01%.

^NYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTKWY and ^NYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer