PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than ^IXIC's 15.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 8.30%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.


^NYA

1D
-0.87%
1M
1.67%
YTD
5.78%
6M
6.75%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
8.30%

^IXIC

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.13%
YTD
15.54%
6M
14.50%
1Y
38.43%
3Y*
26.58%
5Y*
14.22%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYA
NYSE Composite
5.78%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
15.54%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and ^IXIC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 1971

0.79

The correlation between ^NYA and ^IXIC shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYA vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^NYA^IXICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

2.38

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

3.13

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.92

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.60

11.39

-3.79

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and ^IXIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^NYA^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.38

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.64

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.84

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.53

-0.11

Drawdowns

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, smaller than the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and ^IXIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYA^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.01%

-77.93%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-13.21%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.21%

-24.32%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-36.40%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-36.40%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.89%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-21.40%

+11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

3.38%

-1.15%

Volatility

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Composite (^NYA) is 2.94%, while NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that ^NYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^NYA^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

4.28%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.58%

12.13%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

16.25%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

22.43%

-7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

22.01%

-5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


^NYA and ^IXIC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^IXIC has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to ^NYA (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^NYA dropped -59.01% vs ^IXIC's -77.93%.

^IXIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^NYA and ^IXIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer