PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^NYA
NYSE Composite
0.80%15.22%13.32%10.99%-11.53%18.17%4.40%22.32%-11.20%15.84%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
-6.03%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than ^IXIC's -6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has underperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 8.06%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.


^NYA

1D
0.41%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
0.80%
6M
2.50%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
8.06%

^IXIC

1D
1.16%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^NYA vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYA
^NYA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
^NYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NYA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
^NYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NYA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^NYA^IXICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

1.08

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

1.68

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.98

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.36

7.07

-1.72

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and ^IXIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^NYA^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.08

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.73

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and ^IXIC is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, smaller than the maximum ^IXIC drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and ^IXIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^NYA^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.01%

-77.93%

+18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-13.26%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.37%

-36.40%

+14.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-36.40%

-1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-8.84%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-21.46%

+11.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.71%

-1.03%

Volatility

^NYA vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Composite (^NYA) is 4.78%, while NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that ^NYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^NYA^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

7.06%

-2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

13.09%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

23.33%

-7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.83%

22.44%

-7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

21.97%

-5.08%