PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTIU vs. TTDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTIU vs. TTDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTIU achieves a 91.57% return, which is significantly higher than TTDU's -77.55% return.


WTIU

1D
4.02%
1M
-7.74%
YTD
91.57%
6M
66.33%
1Y
103.25%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

TTDU

1D
-5.44%
1M
-31.38%
YTD
-77.55%
6M
-78.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTIU vs. TTDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
91.57%-9.35%
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-77.55%-37.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WTIU and TTDU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTIU vs. TTDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TTDU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTIU vs. TTDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) and T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTIUTTDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

WTIU vs. TTDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTIUTTDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

-0.87

+0.78

Drawdowns

WTIU vs. TTDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTIU drawdown since its inception was -75.73%, smaller than the maximum TTDU drawdown of -89.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIU and TTDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTIUTTDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.73%

-89.89%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.10%

-89.89%

+57.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.19%

-59.22%

+20.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.83%

Volatility

WTIU vs. TTDU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTIUTTDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.51%

107.88%

-40.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.62%

107.88%

-37.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.62%

107.88%

-37.26%

WTIU vs. TTDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTIU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TTDU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTIU vs. TTDU - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTIU nor TTDU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WTIU and TTDU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TTDU.

WTIU and TTDU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: REX and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTIU and 1.50% for TTDU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTIU and TTDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer