PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTAIX vs. WMRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTAIX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 17.01% return. Over the past 10 years, WTAIX has underperformed WMRIX with an annualized return of 1.32%, while WMRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.53% annualized return.


WTAIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.60%
6M
-1.37%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
1.32%
ALL TIME*
3.42%

WMRIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.19%
6M
9.61%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
10.64%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
-0.43%5.05%0.73%5.14%-8.01%0.55%2.60%7.12%0.86%4.30%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
17.01%12.79%2.57%1.12%-8.03%21.49%-2.19%16.85%-7.21%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WTAIX and WMRIX is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2003

0.07

The correlation between WTAIX and WMRIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTAIX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WTAIX
WTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
WTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

WMRIX
WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTAIXWMRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

3.27

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

11.12

-7.50

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the WMRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTAIX and WMRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTAIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum WMRIX drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTAIX and WMRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTAIXWMRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-37.84%

+25.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-7.13%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.06%

-10.95%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.35%

-22.03%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.35%

-31.27%

+18.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-2.03%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-7.15%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.10%

-1.06%

Volatility

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) is 0.79%, while Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that WTAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTAIXWMRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

1.99%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

6.65%

-4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

8.89%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.10%

11.44%

-8.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

12.51%

-9.08%

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTAIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTAIX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison

WTAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than WMRIX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
6.09%7.15%1.02%3.51%6.07%9.29%1.99%3.03%2.84%2.73%0.00%5.31%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
2.50%2.85%2.11%2.03%1.45%1.68%1.72%3.84%2.15%2.92%2.63%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTAIX and WMRIX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMRIX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to WTAIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTAIX dropped -12.35% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.

WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTAIX and WMRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer