PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMRIX vs. JNSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMRIX achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than JNSMX's 8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX has underperformed JNSMX with an annualized return of 5.58%, while JNSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.19% annualized return.


WMRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
11.89%
6M
11.39%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
5.58%

JNSMX

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.40%
YTD
8.28%
6M
7.81%
1Y
18.45%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
11.89%12.79%2.57%1.12%-8.03%21.49%-2.19%16.85%-7.21%11.81%
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
8.28%15.72%8.87%11.71%-17.38%7.25%14.46%15.62%-6.57%16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between WMRIX and JNSMX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2005

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between WMRIX and JNSMX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMRIX vs. JNSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMRIX
WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

JNSMX
JNSMX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JNSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JNSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMRIXJNSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.75

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

11.84

-1.33

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the JNSMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMRIX and JNSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, smaller than the maximum JNSMX drawdown of -39.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMRIX and JNSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMRIXJNSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.84%

-39.85%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-7.00%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-10.60%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.03%

-25.15%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.27%

-25.15%

-6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

-0.07%

-6.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-5.92%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.62%

-0.01%

Volatility

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) is 1.87%, while Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate (JNSMX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that WMRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMRIXJNSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

3.86%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

8.01%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

9.34%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

10.56%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

10.24%

+2.27%

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMRIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than JNSMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMRIX vs. JNSMX - Dividend Comparison

WMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than JNSMX's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNSMX
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Moderate
5.45%5.90%4.28%1.53%2.96%13.36%4.49%5.72%4.86%7.24%1.87%9.16%
WMRIX
Wilmington Real Asset Fund
6.37%7.15%1.02%3.51%6.07%9.29%1.99%3.03%2.84%2.73%0.00%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMRIX and JNSMX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNSMX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to WMRIX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMRIX dropped -37.84% vs JNSMX's -39.85%.

JNSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMRIX and JNSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer