PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTAIX vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTAIX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTAIX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 85.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WTAIX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 1.50%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.85% annualized return.


WTAIX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.21%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.19%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.50%

SMH

1D
1.37%
1M
16.07%
YTD
85.74%
6M
85.96%
1Y
157.81%
3Y*
66.26%
5Y*
40.65%
10Y*
38.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTAIX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
0.88%5.05%0.73%5.14%-8.01%0.55%2.60%7.12%0.86%4.30%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
85.74%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WTAIX and SMH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

-0.08

The correlation between WTAIX and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTAIX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTAIX
WTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTAIX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WTAIXSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.66

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

10.63

-8.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

38.91

-33.04

WTAIX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTAIX and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WTAIX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTAIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTAIX and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTAIXSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-84.96%

+72.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-14.93%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-35.74%

+30.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.35%

-45.30%

+32.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.35%

-45.30%

+32.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

0.00%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-41.01%

+39.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

4.07%

-3.16%

Volatility

WTAIX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) is 0.61%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that WTAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTAIXSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

17.29%

-16.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

28.18%

-26.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

34.14%

-32.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

35.68%

-32.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

32.95%

-29.52%

WTAIX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTAIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTAIX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

WTAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.17%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
2.68%2.85%2.11%2.03%1.45%1.68%1.72%3.84%2.15%2.92%2.63%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTAIX and SMH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (17.29%) compared to WTAIX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTAIX dropped -12.35% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTAIX and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer