WMRIX vs. TZINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX).
WMRIX is managed by Wilmington Funds. It was launched on Jun 30, 2003. TZINX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 10.96% | 12.79% | 2.57% | 1.12% | -8.03% | 21.49% | -2.19% | 16.85% | -7.21% | 11.81% |
TZINX Templeton Global Balanced Fund | 1.25% | 27.85% | 0.73% | 14.45% | -14.31% | -1.44% | 1.70% | 7.58% | -9.18% | 12.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMRIX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than TZINX's 1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX has outperformed TZINX with an annualized return of 5.50%, while TZINX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.38% annualized return.
WMRIX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
TZINX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 4.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMRIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than TZINX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMRIX vs. TZINX — Risk / Return Rank
WMRIX
TZINX
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMRIX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.98 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 2.64 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.70 | -0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.70 | 10.55 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMRIX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.98 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.34 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.39 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.45 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMRIX and TZINX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Dividend Comparison
WMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than TZINX's 4.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 6.45% | 7.15% | 1.02% | 3.51% | 6.07% | 9.29% | 1.99% | 3.03% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 5.31% |
TZINX Templeton Global Balanced Fund | 4.94% | 4.00% | 5.43% | 3.68% | 3.47% | 2.24% | 2.12% | 4.43% | 4.55% | 2.82% | 1.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, roughly equal to the maximum TZINX drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMRIX and TZINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMRIX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -36.06% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -8.42% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -29.60% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.27% | -29.60% | -1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -6.84% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -7.52% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.16% | -0.37% |
Volatility
WMRIX vs. TZINX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) is 2.85%, while Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that WMRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TZINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMRIX | TZINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 5.04% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 7.91% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 11.58% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 11.82% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 11.33% | +1.15% |