WMRIX vs. FFACX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WMRIX (Wilmington Real Asset Fund) and FFACX (Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX returned 5.47%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for FFACX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WMRIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for FFACX.

Performance

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMRIX achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than FFACX's 7.78% return. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX has underperformed FFACX with an annualized return of 5.47%, while FFACX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.79% annualized return.

WMRIX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 16.83%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 5.47%

FFACX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 7.65%
• 1Y: 19.08%
• 3Y*: 13.35%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 6.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	11.89%	12.79%	2.57%	1.12%	-8.03%	21.49%	-2.19%	16.85%	-7.21%	11.81%
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C	7.78%	15.09%	12.06%	11.99%	-12.43%	10.89%	0.71%	16.90%	-10.54%	10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WMRIX and FFACX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2003	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between WMRIX and FFACX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WMRIX vs. FFACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMRIX

WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FFACX

FFACX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FFACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FFACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FFACX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FFACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FFACX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMRIX	FFACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.07	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.94	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.39	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.78	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.58	12.24	-1.66

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FFACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMRIX and FFACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, smaller than the maximum FFACX drawdown of -53.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMRIX and FFACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMRIX	FFACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.84%	-53.66%	+15.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.32%	-6.75%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.95%	-10.99%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.03%	-18.76%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.27%	-30.23%	-1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.32%	-0.17%	-6.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-7.95%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.53%	+0.05%

Volatility

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) is 1.86%, while Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that WMRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMRIX	FFACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.86%	3.58%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.78%	7.68%	-0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.91%	9.10%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.48%	10.09%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.51%	11.48%	+1.03%

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMRIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FFACX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMRIX vs. FFACX - Dividend Comparison

WMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than FFACX's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFACX Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C	4.42%	4.52%	0.39%	0.90%	3.57%	0.45%	6.72%	2.24%	2.38%	2.21%	1.48%	2.17%
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	6.37%	7.15%	1.02%	3.51%	6.07%	9.29%	1.99%	3.03%	2.84%	2.73%	0.00%	5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMRIX and FFACX in my portfolio?

WMRIX and FFACX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMRIX or FFACX?

FFACX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to WMRIX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMRIX dropped -37.84% vs FFACX's -53.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.