PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTAIX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
-0.61%5.05%0.73%5.14%-8.01%0.55%2.60%7.12%0.86%4.30%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTAIX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WTAIX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 1.49%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


WTAIX

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
0.63%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
2.48%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
1.49%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTAIX
WTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
WTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTAIX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

1.41

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.41

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

6.61

-1.74

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTAIX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTAIX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.61

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.68

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.46

+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between WTAIX and ^GSPC is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Drawdowns

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTAIX drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTAIX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WTAIX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-56.78%

+44.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-12.14%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.35%

-25.43%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.35%

-33.92%

+21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-5.78%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-10.75%

+9.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.60%

-1.66%

Volatility

WTAIX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) is 0.93%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that WTAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WTAIX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

5.37%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.40%

9.55%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

18.33%

-14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.05%

16.90%

-13.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

18.05%

-14.62%