WSM vs. LII
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) and LII (Lennox International Inc.) are both stocks. WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while LII operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, WSM returned 26.42%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for LII. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WSM vs. LII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 25.12% return, which is significantly higher than LII's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed LII with an annualized return of 26.42%, while LII has yielded a comparatively lower 14.67% annualized return.
WSM
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- YTD
- 25.12%
- 1Y
- 30.22%
- 3Y*
- 53.28%
- 5Y*
- 25.78%
- 10Y*
- 26.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.01%
LII
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- -10.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.03%
WSM vs. LII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 25.12% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
LII Lennox International Inc. | 9.71% | -19.54% | 37.27% | 89.55% | -24.94% | 19.71% | 13.79% | 12.78% | 6.33% | 37.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and LII is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1999 | 0.40 |
The correlation between WSM and LII shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WSM:
$26.04B
LII:
$18.44B
WSM:
$8.93
LII:
$22.25
WSM:
24.77
LII:
23.82
WSM:
5.01
LII:
1.45
WSM:
3.42
LII:
3.55
WSM:
14.18
LII:
15.28
WSM:
$7.88B
LII:
$5.26B
WSM:
$3.63B
LII:
$1.74B
WSM:
$1.49B
LII:
$1.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSM vs. LII — Risk / Return Rank
WSM
LII
WSM vs. LII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSM | LII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | -0.32 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | -0.51 | +3.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSM vs. LII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than LII's maximum drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and LII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSM | LII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -62.76% | -26.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -33.77% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.79% | -34.71% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.92% | -45.41% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.71% | -46.88% | -12.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -20.57% | +12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -14.52% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 21.57% | -11.21% |
Volatility
WSM vs. LII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 8.19%, while Lennox International Inc. (LII) has a volatility of 10.08%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSM | LII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 10.08% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.34% | 27.61% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.57% | 36.07% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.79% | 32.14% | +12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.22% | 29.45% | +14.77% |
Dividends
WSM vs. LII - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than LII's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LII Lennox International Inc. | 0.99% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.97% | 1.71% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 1.10% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
WSM vs. LII - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Lennox International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSM vs. LII - Profitability Comparison
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
LII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
LII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
LII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSM and LII have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LII has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to WSM (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs LII's -62.76%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSM and LII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer