PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LII vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LII vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LII achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LII has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.44%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


LII

1D
-2.32%
1M
8.04%
YTD
8.14%
6M
6.46%
1Y
-6.23%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
15.44%

SCHG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.09%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LII vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LII
Lennox International Inc.
8.14%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%13.79%12.78%6.33%37.43%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
1.35%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LII and SCHG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between LII and SCHG has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LII vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LII vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIISCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.20

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.10

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

3.58

-3.87

LII vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LII Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LII and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LII vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIISCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.76%

-34.59%

-28.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.77%

-16.41%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-23.39%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.88%

-34.59%

-12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-34.59%

-12.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.70%

-6.46%

-15.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-5.20%

-9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.13%

5.02%

+16.11%

Volatility

LII vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Lennox International Inc. (LII) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that LII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIISCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

5.91%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.74%

12.52%

+14.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.52%

16.24%

+19.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.22%

22.38%

+9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.35%

21.58%

+7.77%

Dividends

LII vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LII
Lennox International Inc.
0.99%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


LII and SCHG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LII has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LII dropped -62.76% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LII and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer