PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LII vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LII vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LII achieves a -13.90% return, which is significantly lower than GOOGL's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LII has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 11.67%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 24.55% annualized return.


LII

1D
-0.38%
1M
-27.04%
6M
-15.55%
YTD
-13.90%
1Y
-30.64%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
11.67%
ALL TIME*
13.99%

GOOGL

1D
6.73%
1M
-1.05%
6M
5.50%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
88.84%
3Y*
39.78%
5Y*
21.67%
10Y*
24.55%
ALL TIME*
25.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.74B$10.31B$11.78B
$319.65M$269.89M$231.88M

LII vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LII
Lennox International Inc.
-13.90%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%13.79%12.78%6.33%37.43%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
13.93%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LII and GOOGL is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2004

0.34

The correlation between LII and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LII:

$14.37B

GOOGL:

$4.31T

EPS

LII:

$22.07

GOOGL:

$19.94

PE Ratio

LII:

18.85

GOOGL:

17.86

PEG Ratio

LII:

1.15

GOOGL:

0.88

PS Ratio

LII:

2.75

GOOGL:

9.78

PB Ratio

LII:

11.16

GOOGL:

7.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

LII:

$5.30B

GOOGL:

$445.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LII:

$1.76B

GOOGL:

$271.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

LII:

$1.14B

GOOGL:

$325.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LII vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LII vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LIIGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.46

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

4.11

-5.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.94

11.67

-13.61

LII vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LII Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LII and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LII vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOGL drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LIIGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.76%

-65.29%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.50%

-21.05%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.66%

-29.81%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.41%

-44.32%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-44.32%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.66%

-11.49%

-26.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-13.01%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.98%

7.41%

+8.57%

Volatility

LII vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Lennox International Inc. (LII) has a higher volatility of 24.39% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 13.03%. This indicates that LII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LIIGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.39%

13.03%

+11.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.95%

24.79%

+11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.93%

32.12%

+8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

31.92%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.19%

29.43%

+0.76%

Dividends

LII vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than GOOGL's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.26%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%

Financials

LII vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennox International Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LII vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lennox International Inc. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 539.50M and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 73.85B and revenue of 119.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 355.00M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 40.77B and revenue of 119.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 269.00M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 112.19B and revenue of 119.80B, resulting in a net margin of 93.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LII and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LII has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to GOOGL (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LII dropped -62.76% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LII and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer