PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LII vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LIICOST
YTD Return38.36%37.07%
1Y Return66.17%64.42%
3Y Return (Ann)27.99%27.81%
5Y Return (Ann)22.52%28.00%
10Y Return (Ann)24.43%24.41%
Sharpe Ratio2.273.28
Daily Std Dev28.60%19.61%
Max Drawdown-62.76%-70.95%
Current Drawdown0.00%-1.67%

Fundamentals


LIICOST
Market Cap$21.97B$399.33B
EPS$18.00$16.13
PE Ratio34.2555.84
PEG Ratio2.165.55
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.02B$174.76B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.61B$21.99B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.01B$6.76B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between LII and COST is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LII vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LII having a 38.36% return and COST slightly lower at 37.07%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LII having a 24.43% annualized return and COST not far behind at 24.41%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
24.02%
21.67%
LII
COST

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LII vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lennox International Inc. (LII) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LII
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LII, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LII, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LII, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LII, currently valued at 4.82, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.004.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LII, currently valued at 17.73, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0017.73
COST
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COST, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COST, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.58
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COST, currently valued at 6.26, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.006.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COST, currently valued at 16.44, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0016.44

LII vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LII Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LII and COST.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.27
3.28
LII
COST

Dividends

LII vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than COST's 2.15% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LII
Lennox International Inc.
0.54%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%1.20%1.08%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.15%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

LII vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LII drawdown since its inception was -62.76%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -70.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LII and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-1.67%
LII
COST

Volatility

LII vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Lennox International Inc. (LII) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.47%. This indicates that LII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.97%
5.47%
LII
COST

Financials

LII vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lennox International Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items