WSM vs. GFF
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) and GFF (Griffon Corporation) are both stocks. WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while GFF operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, WSM returned 27.10%/yr vs 22.94%/yr for GFF. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WSM vs. GFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly lower than GFF's 27.90% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed GFF with an annualized return of 27.10%, while GFF has yielded a comparatively lower 22.94% annualized return.
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
GFF
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 13.38%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 35.26%
- 3Y*
- 37.45%
- 5Y*
- 35.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.94%
WSM vs. GFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
GFF Griffon Corporation | 27.90% | 4.42% | 17.97% | 83.96% | 36.91% | 41.60% | 1.83% | 97.74% | -44.92% | -21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and GFF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, WSM and GFF have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WSM:
$26.80B
GFF:
$4.28B
WSM:
$8.93
GFF:
$0.76
WSM:
25.04
GFF:
124.05
WSM:
5.06
GFF:
1.61
WSM:
3.46
GFF:
1.84
WSM:
14.33
GFF:
45.34
WSM:
$7.88B
GFF:
$2.35B
WSM:
$3.63B
GFF:
$1.00B
WSM:
$1.49B
GFF:
$245.38M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSM vs. GFF — Risk / Return Rank
WSM
GFF
WSM vs. GFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Griffon Corporation (GFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.27 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 3.34 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSM vs. GFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, smaller than the maximum GFF drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and GFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -96.84% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -27.85% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.79% | -27.85% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.92% | -39.02% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.71% | -61.32% | +1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.66% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -55.47% | +30.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.25% | 10.61% | -0.36% |
Volatility
WSM vs. GFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 12.02%, while Griffon Corporation (GFF) has a volatility of 12.72%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSM | GFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 12.72% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.57% | 25.86% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.63% | 36.24% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.77% | 41.23% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.26% | 45.37% | -1.11% |
Dividends
WSM vs. GFF - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than GFF's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFF Griffon Corporation | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.88% | 4.10% | 6.62% | 1.16% | 1.50% | 1.44% | 12.27% | 1.23% | 0.80% | 0.96% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
WSM vs. GFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Griffon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSM vs. GFF - Profitability Comparison
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
GFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a gross profit of 191.99M and revenue of 421.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
GFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported an operating income of 87.35M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
GFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Griffon Corporation reported a net income of 46.94M and revenue of 421.86M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSM and GFF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFF has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to WSM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs GFF's -96.84%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSM and GFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer