WSM vs. CAMT
WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) and CAMT (Camtek Ltd) are both stocks. WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CAMT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, WSM returned 27.10%/yr vs 57.85%/yr for CAMT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WSM vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly lower than CAMT's 81.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of 27.10%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 57.85% annualized return.
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 46.51%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
CAMT
- 1D
- 4.95%
- 1M
- 14.44%
- YTD
- 81.74%
- 6M
- 72.64%
- 1Y
- 163.17%
- 3Y*
- 80.82%
- 5Y*
- 38.31%
- 10Y*
- 57.85%
WSM vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 81.74% | 31.66% | 18.33% | 215.94% | -52.30% | 110.13% | 102.31% | 63.19% | 20.41% | 77.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSM and CAMT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.20 |
The correlation between WSM and CAMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WSM:
$26.80B
CAMT:
$9.95B
WSM:
$8.93
CAMT:
$0.98
WSM:
25.04
CAMT:
197.59
WSM:
5.06
CAMT:
40.27
WSM:
3.46
CAMT:
19.03
WSM:
14.33
CAMT:
14.57
WSM:
$7.88B
CAMT:
$499.09M
WSM:
$3.63B
CAMT:
$250.68M
WSM:
$1.49B
CAMT:
$122.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSM vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank
WSM
CAMT
WSM vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSM | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 6.07 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 14.84 | -10.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSM vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, smaller than the maximum CAMT drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and CAMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSM | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -97.71% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.27% | -27.07% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.79% | -63.16% | +26.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.92% | -63.16% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.71% | -63.16% | +3.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.84% | +6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -55.71% | +30.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.25% | 11.05% | -0.80% |
Volatility
WSM vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 12.02%, while Camtek Ltd (CAMT) has a volatility of 25.19%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSM | CAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 25.19% | -13.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.57% | 50.30% | -24.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.63% | 63.64% | -29.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.77% | 55.76% | -10.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.26% | 51.98% | -7.72% |
Dividends
WSM vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison
WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while CAMT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMT Camtek Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.57% | 2.07% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
WSM vs. CAMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Camtek Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSM vs. CAMT - Profitability Comparison
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
CAMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
CAMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
CAMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSM and CAMT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMT has higher volatility (25.19%) compared to WSM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs CAMT's -97.71%.
CAMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSM and CAMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer