WS vs. LW
WS (Worthington Steel Inc) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. WS operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past year, WS returned 79.79% vs -14.70% for LW. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WS vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WS achieves a 26.59% return, which is significantly higher than LW's 10.21% return.
WS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- YTD
- 26.59%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 79.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LW
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 10.21%
- 6M
- -22.62%
- 1Y
- -14.70%
- 3Y*
- -25.00%
- 5Y*
- -9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
WS vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WS Worthington Steel Inc | 26.59% | 11.18% | 15.44% | 16.60% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 10.21% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WS and LW is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
WS:
$2.16B
LW:
$6.32B
WS:
$2.44
LW:
$2.15
WS:
17.82
LW:
21.09
WS:
17.31
LW:
0.29
WS:
0.65
LW:
0.97
WS:
22.35
LW:
3.46
WS:
$3.35B
LW:
$6.52B
WS:
$411.50M
LW:
$1.34B
WS:
$216.90M
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WS vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
WS
LW
WS vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WS | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.96 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | -0.41 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | -0.71 | +5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WS vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WS drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum LW drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WS and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WS | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -64.56% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.00% | -41.37% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -64.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | -57.84% | +47.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.81% | -21.32% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.48% | 24.00% | -9.52% |
Volatility
WS vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
Worthington Steel Inc (WS) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 9.19%. This indicates that WS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WS | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.90% | 9.19% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.08% | 38.28% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.54% | 44.27% | +5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.31% | 37.84% | +14.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.31% | 35.87% | +16.44% |
Dividends
WS vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
WS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than LW's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.31% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
WS Worthington Steel Inc | 1.47% | 1.85% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WS vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Steel Inc and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WS vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
WS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a gross profit of 76.10M and revenue of 769.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
WS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported an operating income of -1.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
WS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WS and LW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WS has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to LW (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WS dropped -50.98% vs LW's -64.56%.
WS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WS and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer