PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LW vs. CVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LW vs. CVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LW achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than CVV's 129.77% return.


LW

1D
2.75%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.99%
6M
9.23%
1Y
-14.53%
3Y*
-25.20%
5Y*
-9.24%
10Y*

CVV

1D
-9.78%
1M
22.20%
YTD
129.77%
6M
138.26%
1Y
152.67%
3Y*
-4.77%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
-1.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LW vs. CVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
8.99%-35.69%-37.01%22.32%42.89%-18.40%-7.23%18.27%31.81%51.77%
CVV
CVD Equipment Corporation
129.77%-29.77%-0.68%-19.60%33.41%13.77%12.73%-9.30%-69.45%33.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LW and CVV is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016

0.09

The correlation between LW and CVV shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LW:

$2.15

CVV:

-$0.70

PS Ratio

LW:

0.96

CVV:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

LW:

$6.52B

CVV:

$19.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LW:

$1.34B

CVV:

$4.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

LW:

$893.90M

CVV:

-$3.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LW vs. CVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LW
LW Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LW Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CVV
CVV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LW vs. CVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) and CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LWCVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.30

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

3.74

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

6.63

-7.23

LW vs. CVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LW Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the CVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LW and CVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LW vs. CVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LW drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum CVV drawdown of -89.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LW and CVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LWCVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-89.52%

+24.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.37%

-41.04%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.56%

-69.53%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.56%

-83.44%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.30%

-62.98%

+4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.41%

-54.51%

+33.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

23.11%

+1.28%

Volatility

LW vs. CVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) is 8.88%, while CVD Equipment Corporation (CVV) has a volatility of 25.37%. This indicates that LW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LWCVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

25.37%

-16.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.62%

89.86%

-51.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.41%

108.21%

-63.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.90%

78.19%

-40.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.87%

73.88%

-38.01%

Dividends

LW vs. CVV - Dividend Comparison

LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, while CVV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVV
CVD Equipment Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
3.34%3.53%2.15%1.04%1.10%1.48%1.17%0.93%1.04%1.33%

Financials

LW vs. CVV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and CVD Equipment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.56B
1.84M
(LW) Total Revenue
(CVV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LW vs. CVV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and CVD Equipment Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.2%
8.0%
Portfolio components
LW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.

CVV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a gross profit of 147.00K and revenue of 1.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.0%.

LW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

CVV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported an operating income of -1.80M and revenue of 1.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -97.4%.

LW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

CVV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CVD Equipment Corporation reported a net income of -1.66M and revenue of 1.84M, resulting in a net margin of -90.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LW and CVV have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVV has higher volatility (25.37%) compared to LW (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LW dropped -64.56% vs CVV's -89.52%.

CVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LW and CVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer