WS vs. IAG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG).

Performance

WS vs. IAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WS vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WS Worthington Steel Inc	-11.90%	11.18%	15.44%	26.58%
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	14.13%	219.57%	103.95%	-4.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WS : $1.51B IAG : $10.93B
EPS WS : $2.44 IAG : $1.15
PE Ratio WS : 12.43 IAG : 16.30
PEG Ratio WS : 12.08 IAG : 0.09
PS Ratio WS : 0.45 IAG : 3.81
PB Ratio WS : 15.61 IAG : 2.61
Total Revenue (TTM) WS : $3.35B IAG : $2.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) WS : $411.50M IAG : $1.21B
EBITDA (TTM) WS : $216.90M IAG : $1.51B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WS achieves a -11.90% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 14.13% return.

WS

• 1D: 5.68%
• 1M: -26.61%
• YTD: -11.90%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 22.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAG

• 1D: 7.54%
• 1M: -23.40%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 6M: 45.55%
• 1Y: 201.12%
• 3Y*: 90.79%
• 5Y*: 43.07%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WS vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WS

WS Risk / Return Rank: 56
WS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
WS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
WS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WS Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
WS Martin Ratio Rank: 60

IAG

IAG Risk / Return Rank: 95
IAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IAG Omega Ratio Rank: 92
IAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IAG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WS vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WS	IAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	3.23	-2.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	3.12	-2.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.43	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	5.76	-5.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.92	17.44	-15.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WS vs. IAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the IAG Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WS and IAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WS	IAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	3.23	-2.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.12	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between WS and IAG is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WS vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison

WS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
WS Worthington Steel Inc	2.11%	1.85%	2.01%
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WS vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WS drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WS and IAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WS	IAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-95.55%	+44.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.00%	-34.60%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-74.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.36%	-23.40%	-13.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-56.44%	+34.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.89%	11.42%	-0.53%

Volatility

WS vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison

Worthington Steel Inc (WS) has a higher volatility of 21.71% compared to IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) at 20.42%. This indicates that WS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WS	IAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.71%	20.42%	+1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.50%	48.69%	-17.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.83%	62.70%	-13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.43%	59.89%	-7.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.43%	59.14%	-6.71%

Financials

WS vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Worthington Steel Inc and IAMGOLD Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a gross profit of 76.10M and revenue of 769.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

IAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 595.72M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

WS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported an operating income of -1.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.

IAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 576.53M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.2%.

WS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

IAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 412.85M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.