WPSGX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
WPSGX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 28, 1994. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund | -10.24% | 6.29% | 11.16% | 19.70% | -24.61% | 31.53% | 21.22% | 44.50% | 1.56% | 22.99% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WPSGX having a -10.24% return and SCHG slightly higher at -9.73%. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.40%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
WPSGX
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -10.24%
- 6M
- -11.91%
- 1Y
- -0.55%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WPSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WPSGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
WPSGX
SCHG
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WPSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | 0.76 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | 1.24 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.09 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 3.71 | -3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WPSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 0.76 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.79 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.79 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between WPSGX and SCHG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
WPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund | 9.49% | 8.52% | 11.43% | 1.15% | 1.95% | 10.55% | 3.56% | 6.53% | 8.08% | 3.51% | 0.44% | 2.89% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPSGX drawdown since its inception was -90.28%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPSGX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.28% | -34.59% | -55.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -16.41% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -34.59% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.22% | -34.59% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.19% | -12.51% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.85% | -5.22% | -31.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 4.84% | -0.32% |
Volatility
WPSGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) is 5.48%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that WPSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WPSGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 6.77% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 12.54% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 22.45% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 22.31% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.49% | 21.51% | -2.02% |