WPSGX vs. ACGYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WPSGX (AB Concentrated Growth Fund) and ACGYX (AB Income Fund) are both mutual funds - WPSGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while ACGYX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX returned 12.12%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for ACGYX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WPSGX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for ACGYX.

Performance

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPSGX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than ACGYX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX has outperformed ACGYX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while ACGYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.

WPSGX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: -5.20%
• 6M: -4.85%
• 1Y: -2.00%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

ACGYX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 5.83%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: -0.05%
• 10Y*: 2.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund	-5.20%	6.29%	11.16%	19.70%	-24.61%	31.53%	21.22%	44.50%	1.56%	22.99%
ACGYX AB Income Fund	0.63%	7.86%	2.07%	6.16%	-15.45%	-1.30%	6.88%	11.25%	-1.21%	6.33%

Correlation

The correlation between WPSGX and ACGYX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016	0.11

The correlation between WPSGX and ACGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WPSGX vs. ACGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPSGX

WPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ACGYX

ACGYX Risk / Return Rank: 23
ACGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ACGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ACGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ACGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ACGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Income Fund (ACGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WPSGX	ACGYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	1.36	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	2.01	-2.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.25	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	1.79	-1.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	5.81	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPSGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the ACGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPSGX and ACGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPSGX	ACGYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	1.36	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	-0.01	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.41	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.42	-0.24

Drawdowns

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPSGX drawdown since its inception was -90.28%, which is greater than ACGYX's maximum drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPSGX and ACGYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WPSGX	ACGYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.28%	-21.58%	-68.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.52%	-3.36%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.66%	-6.70%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	-21.58%	-11.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.22%	-21.58%	-14.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.31%	-2.19%	-6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-5.41%	-31.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.67%	1.04%	+4.63%

Volatility

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Volatility Comparison

AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to AB Income Fund (ACGYX) at 1.70%. This indicates that WPSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WPSGX	ACGYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	1.70%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	3.32%	+6.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.32%	4.44%	+8.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.09%	6.50%	+11.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.50%	5.47%	+14.03%

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ACGYX's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

WPSGX vs. ACGYX - Dividend Comparison

WPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than ACGYX's 4.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACGYX AB Income Fund	4.92%	5.02%	5.38%	4.04%	3.99%	2.95%	3.80%	4.50%	4.54%	5.84%	3.23%	0.00%
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund	8.98%	8.52%	11.43%	1.15%	1.95%	10.55%	3.56%	6.53%	8.08%	3.51%	0.44%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WPSGX and ACGYX in my portfolio?

WPSGX and ACGYX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WPSGX or ACGYX?

WPSGX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to ACGYX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPSGX dropped -90.28% vs ACGYX's -21.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.