PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WPSGX vs. LCGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


WPSGXLCGFX
YTD Return16.86%29.38%
1Y Return29.51%42.07%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.33%4.81%
5Y Return (Ann)7.90%14.66%
10Y Return (Ann)8.27%10.55%
Sharpe Ratio2.232.47
Sortino Ratio3.043.21
Omega Ratio1.401.45
Calmar Ratio0.362.10
Martin Ratio14.2013.69
Ulcer Index2.00%2.99%
Daily Std Dev12.72%16.57%
Max Drawdown-96.12%-39.85%
Current Drawdown-72.62%-0.03%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between WPSGX and LCGFX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, WPSGX achieves a 16.86% return, which is significantly lower than LCGFX's 29.38% return. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX has underperformed LCGFX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while LCGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.81%
13.78%
WPSGX
LCGFX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LCGFX's 0.65% expense ratio.


WPSGX
AB Concentrated Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for WPSGX: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for LCGFX: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPSGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WPSGX, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for WPSGX, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for WPSGX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for WPSGX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.001.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for WPSGX, currently valued at 14.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.20
LCGFX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 13.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.69

WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the LCGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPSGX and LCGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.23
2.47
WPSGX
LCGFX

Dividends

WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Dividend Comparison

WPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while LCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
WPSGX
AB Concentrated Growth Fund
0.31%0.36%0.00%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCGFX
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.11%0.00%0.21%0.28%0.13%0.00%0.31%

Drawdowns

WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPSGX drawdown since its inception was -96.12%, which is greater than LCGFX's maximum drawdown of -39.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPSGX and LCGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.59%
-0.03%
WPSGX
LCGFX

Volatility

WPSGX vs. LCGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) is 4.13%, while William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that WPSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.13%
5.37%
WPSGX
LCGFX