WOOD vs. RBIL
WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WOOD returned -7.46% vs 4.20% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
WOOD vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.66% return.
WOOD
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- -7.46%
- 3Y*
- -0.50%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WOOD vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -5.06% | -6.54% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.66% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOOD and RBIL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOOD vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
WOOD
RBIL
WOOD vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOOD | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 2.20 | -1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 7.57 | -7.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 32.59 | -33.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOOD vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOOD | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.25% | -0.56% | -62.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -0.56% | -21.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.77% | -0.17% | -22.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -0.08% | -14.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.88% | 0.13% | +10.75% |
Volatility
WOOD vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.33%. This indicates that WOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOOD | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 0.33% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 0.86% | +13.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 0.94% | +17.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 1.06% | +18.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 1.06% | +20.64% |
WOOD vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOOD vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than RBIL's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.37% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.49% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WOOD and RBIL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WOOD has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to RBIL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.20% vs -7.46% for WOOD. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.20% return vs -7.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 2.49% for WOOD.
WOOD is categorized as Materials, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOOD and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer