PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOMN vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOMN vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 11.12% return.


WOMN

1D
0.93%
1M
3.04%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.52%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.47%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.12%
6M
10.90%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOMN vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WOMN
Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF
4.89%8.62%16.95%28.19%-20.61%24.89%34.16%17.61%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between WOMN and BBUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.89

The correlation between WOMN and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WOMN vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WOMN
BBUS

Technology

30.3%
37.1%

Financial Services

14.3%
10.8%

Healthcare

11.0%
8.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.5%

Industrials

6.8%
7.2%

Energy

6.1%
3.2%

Utilities

3.0%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.2%

Technology

WOMN
30.3%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

WOMN
14.3%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

WOMN
11.0%
BBUS
8.1%

Communication Services

WOMN
9.8%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WOMN
7.6%
BBUS
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

WOMN
6.9%
BBUS
4.5%

Industrials

WOMN
6.8%
BBUS
7.2%

Energy

WOMN
6.1%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

WOMN
3.0%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

WOMN
2.0%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

WOMN
1.8%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOMN vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOMN
WOMN Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WOMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
WOMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOMN vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOMNBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.06

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

14.04

-8.14

WOMN vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOMN and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOMNBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.37

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.80

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.84

-0.12

Drawdowns

WOMN vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOMNBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.23%

-35.35%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-9.21%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-19.01%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-25.46%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.28%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-5.45%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.00%

+0.12%

Volatility

WOMN vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.76% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOMNBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.84%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

8.97%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

11.87%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

17.03%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

19.59%

-0.89%

WOMN vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOMN vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%
WOMN
Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF
0.78%0.76%1.08%1.80%5.59%3.10%6.15%1.12%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOMN and BBUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to WOMN (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOMN dropped -32.23% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 8.80% for WOMN. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WOMN.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.78% for WOMN.

WOMN tracks Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WOMN and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOMN and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer