WNTR vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
WNTR and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WNTR is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Mar 26, 2025. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
WNTR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WNTR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 6.27% | 54.43% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 27.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 6.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return.
WNTR
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 79.41%
- 1Y
- 54.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WNTR vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WNTR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
WNTR
SCHG
WNTR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WNTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.75 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.23 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.17 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.03 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.42 | 3.54 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WNTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.75 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.79 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between WNTR and SCHG is -0.48. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
WNTR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.37%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 88.37% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
WNTR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.59% | -34.59% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.59% | -16.41% | -22.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.30% | -13.34% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -5.22% | -13.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.60% | 4.78% | +17.82% |
Volatility
WNTR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a higher volatility of 15.22% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.67%. This indicates that WNTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WNTR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.22% | 6.67% | +8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.38% | 12.51% | +28.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.65% | 22.43% | +29.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.88% | 22.32% | +29.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.88% | 21.51% | +30.37% |