WMT vs. ONEQ
WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock, while ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, WMT returned 18.81%/yr vs 19.41%/yr for ONEQ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMT vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 11.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WMT having a 18.81% annualized return and ONEQ not far ahead at 19.41%.
WMT
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
ONEQ
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.41%
WMT vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMT Walmart Inc. | 3.27% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 11.95% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 22.11% | 44.87% | 38.01% | -3.18% | 29.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMT and ONEQ is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003 | 0.36 |
The correlation between WMT and ONEQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMT vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
WMT
ONEQ
WMT vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMT | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 2.29 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 8.48 | -5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMT vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMT | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.14% | -55.09% | -22.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -12.64% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.93% | -24.09% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -35.23% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.74% | -35.23% | +9.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.61% | -4.44% | -10.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -7.94% | -6.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 3.40% | +2.11% |
Volatility
WMT vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Walmart Inc. (WMT) is 6.81%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that WMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMT | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 7.80% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.65% | 13.82% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 17.51% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 22.38% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 21.77% | +0.01% |
Dividends
WMT vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than ONEQ's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.87% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.84% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMT and ONEQ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEQ has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to WMT (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.
ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMT and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer